A Message Board, Guestbook, or Poll hosted for your website.
Berkeley Place Bulletin Board

Berkeley Place Association > Forums > Gas Drilling > Gas Drilling Next to Berkeley
 
Username:
Password:
 

Thread Tools Search This Thread 
Reply
 
Author Comment
 
Shipman
Super Moderators
Registered: 07/13/06
Posts: 18

    01/11/07 at 08:55 PM
Reply with quote#1

 

Feel free to to post any thoughts you have about Gas Drilling here in this thread. 

 

The URL below is to the city's ordinance on Gas Drilling.  The High-Impact permit would apply to the railyard. 

 

http://www.fortworthgov.org/uploadedFiles/Development/PDF_Files/Applications/gaswell_ordinance.pdf


__________________
-Chris Shipman
GeorgeBean
Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 8

    01/28/07 at 02:14 AM
Reply with quote#2

Chris,
Can you please give us an update on the last BPA meeting that discussed drilling?

The offer in some areas to the west of us is up to $5000/acre + royality for a 3 year lease.  Banding together seems to be helpful.  Park Hill has a lawyer working for them and will meet on Jan. 30.

I think that when rigs begin to go in many residents are going to be very unhappy with the noise and traffic.  600 feet from the nearest house may be much too close.  Then where does the pipeline go?



Shipman
Super Moderators
Registered: 07/13/06
Posts: 18

    01/28/07 at 10:36 AM
Reply with quote#3

George -

Thanks for using the Bulletin Board. 
Putting an update from our meeting here on the Bulletin Board is a fine idea.  The Poobah will be out in just a couple of days, though, and will contain the minutes from the last BPA meeting.  That will be a better synopsis than I can offer here. 

Having said that, I can address some of the hightlights:

 

The Drilling task force presented

1)  Information about their work to date. 

2)  Review of the specific site that we know about that the Task Force found out about.  4-7's, an operator, has obtained a lease to drill on the FWW Rail yard to our east. 

3)  Mark Smith presented a brief discussion of the drilling process.

4)  Randy Means presented an overview of mineral rights leasig

5)  Randy also presented a brief overview of the Permitting process.  The FWW site would require a High Impact permit.  The first step in a high-impact permit is to get a "waiver" from any resident, church, etc who is within 600 feet from a well site.   


Again, the Task Force just presented the facts as known so far.  No voting took place as to whether the neighborhood would be for or against anything. 

Our hope is that the TF will be able to give a "Final Report" at the February meeting with regards to this specific site.  Having said that, it might need to be later - I don't know now.

 

I should note that our situation is quite a bit different than Park Hill's, as I'm sure you can appreciate - as a neighborhood, they are unlikely to be affected at all by any drilling operation noise.  A significant portion of our neighborhood, however, would have to deal with the ~30 days of noise and lights caused by the drilling process.

 

If you've got any specific questions, go ahead and email them to me and I'll put them into this thread. 


__________________
-Chris Shipman
GeorgeBean
Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 8

    02/17/07 at 04:46 PM
Reply with quote#4

The latest offer in Park Hill is for $5000/acre + 25% royalty for 3 years.  I understand that similar offers have been made in the area.  If it works out for Park Hill, the desired drilling point is also near the 8th Ave rail tracks.



DGaines
Registered: 01/10/07
Posts: 2

    02/20/07 at 01:49 PM
Reply with quote#5

 

Is there planned opposition to the drilling permit?  The rail yard is too small.  I have subscribed to Terra Server and Google Earth.  Both have custom measurement tools.  From the furthest proposed site, I see 4 homes within 600 feet.  Does anyone know why there is a surveyors flag (across from Elizabeth Blvd.) in the train yard?  From that location, 9 homes will be within 600 feet.

 

Stanley South needs support when it comes time to oppose this drilling site.  I think we need to gather resources now, even though permitting may be a year or more in the future.  We need environmentalists, property appraisers, insurers, fire/rescue, etc.

 

I hope that we let Mayor Moncrief and City Council know we are holding them responsible for everything that comes with a "high impact" well in our back yard (noise, decreased property values, danger, etc.), so they better feel 100% comfortable with placing us in harms way, if they override our opposition.

 

Thanks,

Damon Gaines

GeorgeBean
Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 8

    02/20/07 at 11:21 PM
Reply with quote#6

Damon,

I think you are right.  From that site 'they' intend to drill under Park Hill, Berkeley, Ryan Place, Fairmount and probably more.  I don't know much about it, but I could see how all that drilling could take a very long time.  Same with the fracing.  It could be very unpleasant for those who live nearby.  I have a friend who is in the gas business who says it won't be that bad, but he does not want a well near his home.  then, where does the pipeline go?

George Bean


syorkwade
Registered: 02/19/07
Posts: 4

    02/22/07 at 07:11 AM
Reply with quote#7

According to the city, there has never been another gas well drilled this close to residential property.

 

 


__________________
Susan Wade
mikeroach
Registered: 01/07/07
Posts: 2

    02/22/07 at 08:09 AM
Reply with quote#8

I encourage you to go to http://www.fwcando.org for information about high impact gas drilling that you won't get from the city.

Guzman
Registered: 11/04/06
Posts: 2

    02/22/07 at 11:41 AM
Reply with quote#9

There is a lot of activity in the field behind Stanley (railroad yard), cleaning up and spreading dirt - as if to prepare the location for something.  Has there been any action by the city or the gas company in selecting the exact drilling location?

clarkegillespie
Registered: 02/24/07
Posts: 1

    02/24/07 at 06:30 PM
Reply with quote#10

Just a few things to think about. All wells are drilled in a northwest to southeast configuration and drain an area 330 feet on each side of the well bore. So if they were putting a well in the rail yard they would have to have leased the properties around it.

 

In the city of Fort Worth they must be 600 feet from the nearest house. SO it would be fairly difficult to drill along eighth. Most drilling locations I have heard about are along the river where there is some separation from the houses.

 

The pipeline is a good question. They can only put them in certain places and they cannot come put one under your house or in the middle of the street so really that should not be an issue for homeowners. It would probably be in the rail right of ways if they cannot tie into the existing transmission lines. I have no idea wht the local lines would handle.

 

I just wouldn't get too excited about most of this. The city really is here to protect us. But when you get down to it the land owner has absolutely NO RIGHT to keep a mineral owner from his minerals. None. So the issue is to learn how to make the situation the best for all in the framework we are given to work with.


__________________
Clarke Gillespie
817-991-3129
clarke@williamstrew.com
http://www.clarkegillespie.com
DGaines
Registered: 01/10/07
Posts: 2

    02/25/07 at 09:28 AM
Reply with quote#11

I've heard and read several sources indicating the 8th Avenue railyard is the prefered site to place gas wells for several neighborhoods.  Four-Sevens currently has the surface lease in the railyard for this operation.

 

Things are happening (materials & equipment) in the the railyard currently.  I'm not sure that the area is being prepared for gas drilling, but I am tring to find out what exactly is happening over there through the City.  I will let everyone know when I get some information.

 

As I understand it, we do have surface rights.  We only have to provide "reasonable access" to minerals.  If the rail yard is not what we believe to be reasonable, then we need to let everyone know.  If we voice our concerns now, the gas drillers can look for alternative sites.  If we don't voice our concerns now, it will be a diffucult "train" to stop. 

 

Thanks,

Damon Gaines  

tonylemon
Registered: 02/26/07
Posts: 4

    02/26/07 at 09:34 PM
Reply with quote#12

I am not sure what work they are doing in the rail yard but I doubt that it is related to drilling a gas well.

The gas driller has not finished the leasing process in the area.

 

And before they can drill they have to get a High Impact Drilling Permit from the city. 

So, I don't think they would be spending any money building a location before both of those things are done.

 

When and if they drill a gas well they will lay a new pipeline down the Railroad right of way.  My understanding is they intend to connect the well drilled on the railroad yard on 8th avenue with wells drilled in the industrial area south of Granbury road and then go south to I-20 and connect into an existing gas line that parallels I-20.  The gas line that brings gas to your home is a separate system and gas wells will never be directly connected to any of those gas lines.

 

To provide full disclosure I am in the oil and gas business.  However, I don't have any interest in the local drilling except as a homeowner and taxpayer. 

 

I am in favor of urban drilling because it will provide a huge source of tax revenue to the city, school district, hospital district and all the other taxing entities without requiring those taxing authorities to give much back to the owners and operators of the gas wells. 

 

Your property taxes are ad valorem taxes.  The gas wells will be taxed ad valorem taxes by all of those entities just like your house is taxed for ad valorem taxes.  Ad valorem taxes primarily are local taxes.  In addition to the ad valorem taxes, the State of Texas will collect a "severance tax" which on natural gas is 7% of the market value of the gas sold at the wellhead.

 

The severance tax will go to Austin and they will do with it whatever they do with all the other taxes.  But, the ad valorem taxes will be local taxes that we can use to dramatically improve the quality of life in Fort Worth without raising our ad valorem taxes on our homes.  I think that is a good trade off. 

 

In addition to that the economic activity of the Barnett Shale drilling will have a big upside for our local economy.

 

My read on the mayor and city council was that in the beginning they were opposed to urban drilling.  But, now they are for it.  I wasn't there so I don't know but here is my guess about what happened to change their views. 

 

A lawyer explained to them that under state law a mineral interest had a right to produce those minerals and often that right superseded the rights of the surface owners.  And the city under state law had very limited rights to dictate to the gas drillers what they could do or not do without getting sued by those gas drillers and then losing in court because of the state laws that guaranteed the mineral interest's right to produce those minerals. 

 

An accountant explained to them how much tax money the city and other local taxing authorities would be receiving from the ad valorem taxes on the gas wells drilled.  (In addition to those taxes the city will get paid directly for all the minerals they own and lease to a gas driller when those wells start producing.)

 

With the tax revenue on urban gas drilling increasing, either our ad valorem taxes on our homes should go way down or what we get from those entities that tax us should go way up.

 

I have been in the oil and gas business for 40 years and around it for the other 15 years of my life.  So, I am comfortable with the engineering safeguards which will protect us in our neighborhoods. 

 

I am less comfortable in trusting the local politicians to use this tax windfall to maximize the benefit to our city and schools.

 

 

 

 

GeorgeBean
Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 8

    02/27/07 at 08:11 PM
Reply with quote#13

Tony,

Thanks for the informed viewpoint.  Can you please tell us about the noise level of a drilling site during the drilling process, the fracing process and beyond?  Also, how long might each step last, considering that that one site might be used for drilling in six or more directions? Furthermore, what is done with all the water used in the process?  Do you expect much ground shifting, like they have experienced in the Houston area, due to the drilling and fracing?  Finally, any other downsides for those how live closest to the drilling site?  I fully expect waivers to the 600' rule to be granted.

Thanks,
George

tonylemon
Registered: 02/26/07
Posts: 4

    02/27/07 at 10:49 PM
Reply with quote#14

George

I expect there will be waivers to the 600' rule because the state rule is less than 600'.  Having a city ordinance that is greater than the state rule forces it before an open hearing but does not guarantee that there will never be exceptions.  The gas drilling companies supported the 600' rule in the city ordinance as long as there was a mechanism in place for waivers. 

 

I am not sure about the ground shifting in Houston.  But, here is a guess.  And it only is a guess.  A geologist could better explain it than me.

 

My understanding is that there are some oil formations along the gulf coast that produces oil out of salt domes.  I THINK those are more like what most people think when they think of an oil or gas field, an underground cave full of oil or gas. 

 

AND if the ground was shifting because of the production of the oil or gas then the wells must be shallow, producing from a zone close to the surface.

I am more certain about the rest of this.

 

The Barnett Shale and most other oil and gas fields are not like underground caves.  The Barnett Shale is more like a sponge.  And the sponge is very dense with not many holes and the holes are not well connected.  In fact the rock is so dense and the holes not connected that only in the last few years have gas drillers figured out how to get the gas out of the rock.  The Barnett Shale is not a field that they just found.  People have known about it since the 1950's.  However, no one thought you could ever get the gas out of the rock. 

 

The gas occurs in the holes of the rock.  The "fracing" cracks open the rock connecting all of the holes and lets the gas flow to the well bore and to the surface and down the pipeline.  They frac a well by pumping water and sand into the formation (Barnett Shale in this case). That fractures the rock.  The sand does two things.  It helps to "crack" the rock open and then it stays in the crack to keep it from closing back up after they stop pumping the water. 

 

So, I don't think the ground will be shifting for two reasons.  Producing the gas does not remove the shale.  It will still be there to support everything above it.  AND, these wells are relatively deep, 7-8 thousand feet deep.

 

I think it takes about 3 weeks to drill a Barnett Shale well.  The drilling operation will be 24/7.  After they drill the well they will set casing (pipe that cases the well bore) and then move the rig off of the location and then as I understand it the 24/7 work stops. 

 

As to the noise the drilling will make my best suggestion is this drive around until you find a derrick on the horizon and drive as close to it as you can get and listen.  My guess is they will use an electric rig to drill in neighborhoods but they will still have diesel engines running the generators that makes the electricity.  In addition to the engine noise you will hear steel banging against steel from time to time. 

 

From articles in the paper the noise which seems to be most irritating to people living near a drilling rig in operation is the brake squeaking as it is released.  As the well gets deeper, the driller puts a limited amount of weight on the drill bit as it drills into the rock.  The brake is what limits the amount of weight on the drill bit.  As the bit progresses through the rock the weight on the bit grows less and less and periodically the brake releases putting more weight on the bit, continuing the drilling process.  The brake releasing and then grabbing a new hold squeaks or screeches.  Most of the other noises around a drilling rig will be similar to the noises they make on the railroad, engines running, metal clanging.  But, the screech of the brake will be a new noise in the neighborhood.  (You can actually know how much "hole they are making" by listening to the brake.  If the rock is hard and the drilling is slow the brake will screech infrequently.  If you hear the brake screech frequently the rock is soft and the drilling is fast.)

 

I will know a lot more about fracing a Barnett Shale well in a month or so.  I have an invitation to be on location for a frac job.  But, here is what I know about fracing in general.  The fracing process is noisy but different than the drilling noise. 

 

During fracing there will be multiple pump trucks hooked into a manifold which is hooked into the wellhead.  Each of those pump trucks have a large engine on the back of the truck which will run at a high rpm during the fracing process.  The best way to describe it is a bunch of trucks clustered together "racing" their engines.  The noise from a frac job is a whining noise.  They are doing really large frac jobs on these wells so I think they will frac over a series of two or three days.  I think the city permit process prohibits fracing at night, at least without special permission. 

 

They will move frac tanks onto the drill site and then haul water into the site to fill the frac tanks.  Frac tanks look a lot like the containers shipped from China that we see on the trains all the time, except they have truck sized wheels on one end of them.  If I were in charge of the frac job and I won't be, I would position those frac tanks between where the frac trucks were going to be and the nearest neighbors.  That would block and mitigate the noise.

 

After they frac the well they will "flow it back" probably into some of those same frac tanks.  Initially, there will be a little gas and a lot of water as the well produces back the water pumped into it.  Trucks will come onto the well site and haul the produced water to a Salt Water Disposal well where it will be disposed of in an underground formation.  Initially, there will be a lot of water to dispose of.  Eventually, there won't be a lot.  One of the larger gas drillers is hauling some of this produced water to a recycling plant.  Salt water disposal, the hauling of the water and the disposing of it in a disposal well is highly regulated by the Texas Railroad Commission.  I believer the city has forbidden Salt Water Disposal wells inside the city limits.

 

When all of the drilling and fracing is finished there will be a series of valves called a wellhead which will be about 5 feet tall.  A pipe will come out of that and go to a small vessel that will separate the liquids, water and condensate (oil) from the gas.  The gas will then go down the pipeline.  There will be two tanks on the location.  One will be a water tank and one will be an oil tank. The city requires security fencing and I think they limit the height of the tanks to 8 feet.

 

Occasionally, a truck will come by and pick up the water or the oil.   A "pumper" in a pickup should come by daily to read a meter and a pressure gage and check on the water and oil tank and make a visual inspection of everything.

 

I don't think there will be a downside after the well is drilled and completed.  I think the railroad and trucks haul chemicals through our neighborhood which are potentially more dangerous to us than a gas well will be.  Atmos has gas lines laid all over our neighborhood so we can have natural gas in our homes.  Occasionally, a backhoe cuts a Atmos gas line and it makes the TV news especially if there is a fire.  It could happen tomorrow but I don't worry about it.

 

My gas line to my home was installed in 1953.  In my mind my chances of having trouble with the gas in that line is higher than any problem a gas well might cause in the neighborhood. 

 

Nor am I worried about the decline of property values.  If we take the taxes the gas wells are going to pay and improve our schools and our city even people in Dallas will want to move here.

 

What I have described is the drilling and fracing of one well.  If they drill multiple wells from one pad site the process would be longer.

 

Thanks

Tony

 

Guzman
Registered: 11/04/06
Posts: 2

    02/28/07 at 01:08 PM
Reply with quote#15

 I appreciate all of the information regarding the drilling process and view on the tax revenues for the city.  Does anyone have information concerning the effect the drilling and wells will have on property values for the homeowners who will have the wells basically in their backyards?  Having the railroad yard is one thing but to have several gas wells drilled within 400-600 feet to your property line I think would be concerning to a prospective buyer should current homeowners need and/or decide to sell.  Any insight or information regarding property values would be appreciated.

 

 

mikeroach
Registered: 01/07/07
Posts: 2

    02/28/07 at 02:45 PM
Reply with quote#16

Tony,

Thanks for all the info on gas wells. I have heard that there could/will be a compressor on the 8th Ave. sight after the well is drilled. What can you tell me about these compressors?

Mike

tonylemon
Registered: 02/26/07
Posts: 4

    02/28/07 at 07:59 PM
Reply with quote#17

Mike

We don't want a compressor on 8th Ave.  They are loud and run 24/7. 

 

A compressor is used when the wellhead pressure is lower than the pipeline pressure.  In that case without a compressor, no gas would ever leave the ground.  However, if they keep the pipeline pressure below the wellhead pressure then the gas will leave the ground and move down the pipeline. 

 

I am sure an engineer could better explain it than this but I think of it this way.  When the wellhead valve is opened the natural pressure of the gas formation pushes gas up the well bore and down the pipeline towards an eventual compressor.  The compressor is hooked into the pipeline and pulls gas to itself and then pushes that same gas beyond itself further down the pipeline to another compressor that does the same thing.

 

At some point on the pipeline they will need a compressor.  But, they don't have to have a compressor on 8th Ave.  They can set a compressor in the industrial area south of Granbury road.  A compressor set there would keep them from ever needing to set a compressor on 8th Ave.

 

The way we keep them from ever setting a compressor on 8th Ave is to put a clause in the gas lease that we sign with the gas driller that forever prohibits a compressor on 8th Ave.  A lease is a contract and they can't break the clause that prohibits a compressor and keep the part that allows them to produce the gas from our mineral interest.

 

That is one of the reasons it is in our neighborhood's interest that we enter into a gas lease.  If we enter into a lease that pools our mineral interest with the mineral interest of the railroad they can never produce gas from a well on the railroad property that violates the terms that we have included in the lease we have signed.  That is how we keep them from ever setting a compressor on 8th Ave.

 

None of us in Berkeley have to sign a lease.  But, the gas driller already has a lease with the railroad.  All they need is a few adjoining property owners to lease to them to drill a well on the railroad property.  However, with none of us in the lease we won't be able to have any control over what they do or don't do on the railroad property.  With a lease which contains a clause prohibiting a compressor we can keep a compressor off of the 8th Ave. site.

Tony

PS  A compressor in the industrial area won't bother anyone.  We are not shifting our problem to another neighborhood.

GeorgeBean
Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 8

    03/03/07 at 10:26 PM
Reply with quote#18

Tony,

Thanks a million, you are a wealth of information.

Can somebody please tell me if you can drill in several directions at once?  As I understand it, the driller is likely to drill in multiple areas from the 8th Ave site.  So will it be 3 weeks to make it under Park Hill, then another 3 weeks for drilling under Ryan Place, etc...  If that is the case, drilling could go on for months.  Might a driller come back to that site at a future date to drill in another direction in the months or years to come?

Thanks,
George

Shipman
Super Moderators
Registered: 07/13/06
Posts: 18

    03/13/07 at 08:48 AM
Reply with quote#19

 

Can somebody please tell me if you can drill in several directions at once? 

 

I think you're asking if they could theoretically put more than one pipe down at once and, say, go NW with one and SE with the other - knocking out 2 wells at the same time to potentially minimize drilling time? 
Interesting question.  I've seen several wells around town, but haven't ever seen more than one together on the same site going up at the same time. 


__________________
-Chris Shipman
tonylemon
Registered: 02/26/07
Posts: 4

    03/18/07 at 09:49 PM
Reply with quote#20

Chris
I don't think they can drill in two directions at once in a single well.  I do think they can have multiple lateral (horizontal) segments into different areas off of one vertical well. 
 
However, I don't know if that is how they plan to drill the wells in our area of town.  If they use one vertical well with multiple lateral segments then they will save some drilling time because they won't have to drill a new vertical well for every lateral segment. 
 
But, even if that is the case I don't have any experience to even guesstimate how much drilling time they would save which would be drilling time our neighborhood would avoid.
Tony
ddsety
Registered: 11/07/06
Posts: 3

    04/14/07 at 12:12 PM
Reply with quote#21

As a property owner on McCart, I now have my official lease offer.  I have spoken with a very informed lawyer on the subject of oil and gas leases.  There will indeed be a lot of noise and lights for 30 to 60 days on 8th Avenue.  I am trying to verify that the compressor will be NOWHERE near ANY of our neighborhoods.  Given that, I intend to sign the lease.  There is negligible impact on our property values once the well is in production (might be a hard sell if you're trying to sell during the digging phase).

syorkwade
Registered: 02/19/07
Posts: 4

    04/14/07 at 04:01 PM
Reply with quote#22

I am not a gas expert, but, here are a few things I have learned from experts and reliable sources: 

The Ryan Place web site states that Four Sevens plans to drill 6-10 wells on 8th Ave.  A gas expert relayed to me that any drilling company would want to drill these wells consecutively, as it would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars each time they removed the drilling equipment and then brought it back (to drill the next well).  If this is the case, we would be looking at a lot of noise and lights for 30 -60 days X 6-10 wells, or over a year. 

As far as property values go, I spoke with an appraiser this week. He told me that this is such a new area that nobody can predict how an inner city gas well could affect property values. He did say this: the well would affect the property values of Stanley Avenue and "a couple of streets over" during the drilling process. Then, if no accidents happen, and they come back and landscape the area as promised, the property values would likely return after the drilling. I mentioned to him that a house on Stanley lost a potential buyer a few weeks ago  on the speculation of the gas well.  He said: "Well, there is your answer, it has already affected the marketability of Stanley". 

I appreciate your concern.


__________________
Susan Wade
Shipman
Super Moderators
Registered: 07/13/06
Posts: 18

    05/14/07 at 08:26 AM
Reply with quote#23

 
 
These FAQ's are FROM the Ryan Place Improvement Association's Drilling Task Force: 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

At the March Special Meeting, and subsequent time frame, questions continue to arise, and answers are researched to keep all homeowners in Ryan Place informed about the proposed gas drilling activity along 8th Avenue.  These have been updated on a regular basis as the answers are secured.

 

There are two companies vying for the mineral rights of the RPIA homeowners:

Four Sevens represented by LPS.  Four Sevens was formerly represented by Colt Exploration.  Four Sevens drill site is proposed along 8th Avenue, across from Braums.

 

Fort Worth Energy, who claims to be in partnership with Chesapeake.  The FWE site is in an industrial area east of Hemphill, between Page and Jessamine, along Jennings.

 

LIKE AN ELECTION, IF YOU SIGN A LEASE WITH THE RESPECTIVE COMPANIES ABOVE, YOU ARE CASTING YOUR VOTE AND AGREEING TO THE DRILLING ON THEIR PROPOSED SITE. 

 

WE ENCOURACE ALL HOMEOWNERS NOT TO SIGN ANY LEASE UNTIL RPIA CAN FINALIZE A COMMUNITY LEASE WITHIN THE NEXT 30-60 DAYS.

 

Update to the questions are in BLUE.  If a question is marked “TBD”…it is being researched by an RPIA-GO Committee member, and will be posted at a later date.

 

 

 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ’S):

 

 

Recap of questions from The Special RPIA.Meeting:

 

WHERE DOES THE PIPELINE ALONG THE FW&W RR END?

In answer to a question Mr. Holcomb explained that his pipeline ROW terminated in Cleburne.

 

FWE is planning to run their pipeline down the railroad easement on the UP and BNSF tracks east of Hemphill.  It will merge with a collection line south of I-20.

 

WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF THE WATER USED IN THE PROCESS?

He stated that the water used in the fracturing process can come from several sources but that in all cases it is recovered and reused.

 

FWE indicated that they will purchase water from the City of Fort Worth, and that the used water will be trucked away.

 

WILL GAS LINES RUN THROUGH RYAN PLACE NEIGHBORHOOD?

He stated that there would not be gathering lines through the neighborhood.

The transfer lines will run along the Fort Worth and Western RR tracks. Leases have been signed with railroad to use the easement.

 

WHAT TYPE OF NOICE WILL BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE DRILLING?

He reported that there would be some noise associated with the drilling process but probably not more than the trains passing through the area. And also that this noise is continuous and could last as long as 45 days. (n.b. This was later clarified that this is 45 days per well, and potentially 6+ wells will be drilled on the site.)

 

FWE is planning on drilling approximately 12 wells at their site.  The noise will be similar to that proposed by Colt/Four Sevens.

 

ARE THERE EVACUATION PLANS IN THE EVENT OF AN EXPLOSION? AND IF SO WHO IS FINANCIALLY LIABLE?

He next reported that they have contingency and evacuation plans for the drilling of this site but that he has not personally seen them and also that the drilling company would be financially liable for losses.

 

By law both companies are required to have published evacuation plans files with the City in the event of a disaster.  Fort Worth Fire Department and Police Department have not opposition to either site at this time.

 

WHAT IS THE NOISE LEVEL TO BE ENCOUNTERED?

In answer to another question Mr. Holcomb reported that he does not have a decibel rating chart the noise associated with wells when they are at a distance from the neighborhood. He also said that when the fracturing process is occurring, the Frac trucks can be fairly loaded.

 

WILL TRUCKS PASS THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD?

He stated that the Frac trucks would probably not have to pass through the neighborhood. There is no logical reason for them to pass through the residential area, and only would travel on commercial traffic approved streets.

 

With the FWE drill site east of Hemphill, the truck traffic will be on Hemphill, and South Main, east of Ryan Place.

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:” The basic city rules are that, unless a truck is involved in a specific delivery to a location that can only be reached by traveling on a residential street, then all "commercial" truck traffic is restricted to truck and commercial routes.  These rules likewise apply to any truck traffic associated with a gas well. 

 

The Gas Well Ordinance specifically addresses this issue in Sec. 15-36, Sec. I, Paragraph H - "Vehicle Routes for High Impact Gas Well Permit".  (Found on page 18 of the ordinance, when printed from the web site.) 

It requires all vehicles associated with drilling or production to use "truck" routes, and they can use a "commercial delivery" route only when not possible to use truck route.  Truck routes are more restrictive then commercial routes, and fewer in number.  The upshot of this is that residential traffic is strictly prohibited”

 

 

WHAT IS THE TOTAL TIME THAT DRILLING WILL TAKE PLACE?

He stated that the drilling process is 45 days per well and that there could be 6 – 10 wells in this area.

 

The drilling at the proposed FWE site will last for 18 months, using the same time per well as proposed for the 8th Avenue site by Four Sevens.

 

HOW LONG WILL THE WELL OPERATE?

He stated that it appears that the average life expectancy for wells in this year could be anywhere from 35 – 100 years, based on geologist information available on the Barnett Shale.

 

HOW MANY LEASES HAVE TO BE SIGNED TO BEGIN DRILLING?  HOW MANY ARE CURRENTLY SIGNED?

Per Colt, they have, to date (3/23/07), 61 acres under lease, including the drill site, between the 350 acres between Ryan Place and Berkley.  Most of this is from Ryan place, the apartment complex of Park Hill, and commercial properties along 8th Avenue. Most of Berkley residents are waiting for the community lease.

 

FWE has signed many of the Fairmont residents but they are waiting to work with RPIA on the community lease, as we have suggested to them.  However, they will continue to send letters to RPIA homeowners, and some may sign on their own.

 

Colt/Four Sevens stated that although he does not need to have a lease agreement with all property owners before drilling he would prefer to get them all in agreement and that that would be his desire. It was further clarified that they hope to get at least 75
% of the homeowners to sign leases, which would make the drilling process easier, other wise they have to route the drill around those properties that have not signed.

 

As of this update( 5/13/07) , less than 10% of RPIA homeowners have signed leases.  Approximately 70% of Fairmont have signed leases, and practically no one in Berkley have signed leases.

 

WHO HAS ALL RECEIVED LETTERS TO DATE?

He stated that he has now sent offers to residents of Mistletoe, Berkeley, Fairmont and Ryan Place neighborhoods.  Some residents did not receive a letter under the original mailing but they continue to send letters as they research the TAD tax rolls.

 

FWE has mailed letters to most RPIA homeowners, but not specific offers have been made.

 

Both companies have agreed in principle to work with RPIA on a community lease, but they will continue to solicit homeowners, and use creative ways to get people to sign leases, until we have a common lease that represents the neighborhood.

 

 

ARE THE MINERAL RIGHTS FOR JUST GAS AND OIL OR ALL MINERALS?  HOW DO HOMEOWNERS KNOW?

Mr. Holcomb stated that although the property deed of homeowners may not mention oil and gas rights that the work done by his company has verified that residents here do not have a reservation on mineral rights. (n.b.  The leasing company must verify mineral rights in the lease before they can execute the final lease with the homeowner)

 

WHERE IS THE TRANSMISSION/TRANSFER LINE FOR THE GAS?

He said that the pipeline ROW will be on the Fort Worth and Western rail line.

 

FWE will run their pipeline down the UP/BNSF rail lines east of Hemphill.

 

WILL THERE BE A SURFACE SLUDGE PIT FOR DRILL WASTE WATER?

He said that there would be no sludge pits associated with these wells.  The drilling waste will be contained in a closed loop system that allows for it to be captured and hauled away.

 

HAS FOUR SEVENS DRILLED IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT BEFORE?

He stated that Four Seven’s has experience drilling in urban environments.

 

FWE does not have experience in drilling in an urban environment, but their “partner” Chesapeake has experience in drilling in an urban environment.  Neither company has drilled in an “historic” neighborhood.

 

HOW MUCH WATER IS USED IN THE PROCESS?

He reported that the well would use probably less water than what a golf course uses daily. (Additional research has shown that approximately 1MM gallons are used in the drilling process, and at least three times that in the fracing process per well head)

 

WHERE WILL THE WELLS BE DRILLED?

He reported that all wells drilled would be within the 3 acre ROW secured from the Railroad. (Fort Worth, Western RR along 8th Avenue)

 

FWE is planning on a site, east of Hemphill in the industrial area between Page and Jessamine, along Jennings east to South Main.

 

WILL THE GAS WELL/DRILLING AFFECT MY PROPERTY VALUE?

He reported that there could be a property tax increase from TAD if royalty checks are being distributed. (This is true, if gas is found, and distribution of funds occurs to leaseholders)  More research is being conducted, and information on the formula’s used to calculate the taxes. See the answer later in the FAQ’s.

 

HOW MUCH WOULD THE AVERAGE ROYALITIES BE PER CITY LOT?

He reported that he estimates royalties would run probably around 30 per month per well per lot.

 

WILL THE DRILLING HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE SOIL STRUCTURE, THUS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING THE FOUNDATIONS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD?

He reported that the drilling operations should have NO impact on foundations in the area, with  the lateral lines being 1 to 1.5 miles below the surface.  This has now been confirmed with a couple geologist who live in the neighborhood.

 

HOW LONG WILL THE PROCESS TAKE?

He reported that his timeline for signing leases is dependent on the residents in the area. He said that after leases have been secured it would be another 12 – 18 months before drilling could begin.

 

FWE indicated that drilling would not start for atleast two years, under current planning.

 

HOW IS HE APPROACHING THE LEASING PROCESS WITH OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS?

He stated that he has proposed a community lease, allowing all residents within the 800 acre drilling unit to participate in all royalties within the lease. He said the alternate method would be to draw leases up on smaller units where all neighbors do not participate. (n.b. The Ryan Place committee is working with the other neighborhood associations: Berkeley, Park Hill, Mistletoe, Fairmont, to determine what they are doing, and how to marshal resources.)

 

FWE’s lease area affecting RPIA is 8th Avenue on the West, Berry on the South, Jessamine on the North, and  I-35 on the East.

 

WHAT IS THE PRESSURE COMING OFF THE WELL HEAD?

He said that while he was not sure what the PSI for these wells are but that he did know it was a low pressure well.  There are very specific regulations regarding the safety of the well site, and these are monitored by the State and Federal Governments, and the Railroad Commission.

 

 

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE GAS IS REMOVED FROM THE SHALE?  WILL THE STRUCTURE COLAPSE OR AFFECT THE SOIL STRUCTURE ABOVE?

He stated that he did not know of any long term studies on how moisture loss from the ground could affect foundations.  There is no known effect of the moisture affecting the shale structure once the gas has been evacuated.  Again, this particular drill hole will be over 5000 feet below the surface.

 

WHAT IS THE NOISE LEVEL AFTER THE DRILLING CEASES?

He said that after the wells are in and producing there should be no appreciable sound associated with the operation of the gas line.  The compressor required to move the gas along the pipeline will not be located at the 8th Avenue site.

 

 

 

CAN WE LIMIT THE LEASE TO JUST GAS AND OIL?

He stated that the lease documents sent to residents include oil, gas and minerals but that they would be happy to strike minerals from the lease agreements.

 

WHAT ARE THE PLANS FOR SEISMIC TESTING OF THE FORMATION?

Both FWE and Four Sevens stated that seismic has not been performed and that it was not planned on because of the potential negative impact on foundations.

 

ARE THERE ANY STUDIES TO VALIDATE IF PROPERTIES VALUES WOULD INCREASE?

He stated that property values would most likely increase because the properties would become revenue producing but that he was unaware of any specific studies addressing that issue. He reported that in other area in Fort Worth have seen property value increases from TAD because of drilling operations.

 

WHAT ARE THE CURRENT AGREEMENTS BEING OFFERED?

Four Sevens stated that the lease agreements currently available offer $500 lease bonus and a royalty that could be $35 – $70 dollars a month.  FWE has not offered a specific amount yet, awaiting the community lease from RPIA.

 

HOW MANY LEASES HAVE BEEN SIGNED TO DATE? HOW MANY WELLS CAN BE ACCOMODATED IN THE AREA?

He reported that only a small portion of the 800 acre unit has been leased yet. He also reported that that lateral spacing requirements would not allow 30 – 40 wells in this area.

Per Colt, they have, to date (3/23/07), 61 acres under lease, including the drill site, between the 350 acres between Ryan Place and Berkley.  Most of this is from Ryan place, the apartment complex of Park Hill, and commercial properties along 8th Avenue. Most of Berkley residents are waiting for the community lease.

 

 

 

 

WHERE ARE OTHER WELLS IN THE AREA, AND HOW ARE THEY DOING?

He next stated that he would be willing to show where some other wells in the area are and provide also revenue and production volumes if asked and given a means of distributing this information.

 

FWE has purchased property for three separate drill sites in the industrial areas along the railroad tracks, east of  Hemphill, between there and I-35, heading south towards I-20.

 

WHAT REMAINS ON THE SITE, ONCE THE DRILLING IS COMPLETED?

He concluded his presentation by explaining that once the drilling rig has completed its work that what would be left on the site would be a separator and a wellhead along with a small holding tank. He said those facilities would be contained within a firewall and would not be visually distracting to residents.

 

 

Additional questions since the kick off of the RPIA-GO Committee:

 

If a question is marked “TBD”…it is being researched by an RPIA-GO Committee member, and will be posted at a later date.

 

 

WHAT WAS THE SOURCE OF THE LEASE HOLDERS/PROPERTY OWNERS?

(2006 TAD data)

 

IF I DID NOT GET A LEASE, WHAT SHOULD I DO?  

(Contact Colt Exploration, or wait for Ryan Place to get the community lease in order.)

 

IT HAS BEEN STRONGLY SUGGESTED THAT ALL RPIA HOMEOWNERS HOLD OFF ON SIGNING ANY LEASE WITH EITHER FW ENERGY OR COLT EXPLORATION/FOUR SEVENS.

 

WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE TO GET RPIA HOMEOWNERS TO SIGN ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD WIDE LEASE?

(RPIA meeting, newsletter: Potentially there will be a mass mailing from the leasing company to homeowners, with cover letter from RPIA)

 

WHEN WILL TAD INCREASE THE PROPERTY VALUES? AFTER THE LEASE IS SIGNED, BEFORE THE GAS FLOWS?  WHEN?                

(Any valuation will not begin until approximately 12 months after the completion of the well, after a complex set of formulas in accordance with Texas laws.  In general, it is believed that the actual amount for each property will be relatively significant, contrary to reports published.

 

WHERE IS THE COMPRESSOR STATION TO BE LOCATED IN RELATION TO THE WELL?

The compressor runs 24 x 7.  Colt and Four Sevens have agreed that there will be no compressor along the pipeline in our area, nor at the drill site at 8th Avenue.  This will greatly reduce noise post drilling.  This will be included in the terms of the community lease.

 

 

WILL THE DRILLING AFFECT MY FOUNDATION?

(Per BlakeGeoServices: We do not think there will be any effect on the foundations.  We are dealing with taking a small % of in-place gas from a reservoir which is as stable and non-porous as a brick, not to mention the Barnett occurs 1.5 miles below the surface.  To my knowledge, subsidence can occur in more geologically complex areas, when either oil or water is withdrawn in large percentages from shallow reservoirs or aquifers in limestone or faulted terrains leading to sinkholes or slippage along fault planes. In my opinion, no concern here.)

 

THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT NORTH-SOUTH TRAFFIC CONCERNS FOR 8TH AVENUE.  WHAT IS THE PROPOSED ROUTE OF THE TRUCKS TO SERVICE THE WELL?                                 

Per City Ordinance, trucks are restricted to commercial routes, and truck routes, which for the area in question, is Rosedale, 8th Avenue, Berry, Cleburne, and Granbury, to name a few.

 

FWE is bound by the same City Ordinance as Colt/Four Sevens. However, most traffic will be east of Hemphill, between there and South Main.

 

HOW ARE THEY GOING TO MARKET THEMSELVES?  WHO PAYS THE TRANSPORT COSTS TO THE DISTRIBUTION HUB?  (This needs to be addressed in the lease discussions. The intent is to have the leases free of fees for marketing and/or transportation of the gas to end destination)

Per Colt Exploration, there are to be no additional charges from Four Sevens to the leaseholders for transporting the gas, nor marketing fees.  This must be stipulated in the lease.

 

ARE WE GETTING ROYALTIES ON EVERYTHING THEY CAN SELL OR JUST OIL AND GASS?  (This needs to be addressed in the lease discussions, but the intent is to limit activity to gas and oil.)

 

CAN RYAN PLACE ACT AS A PROXY FOR FAIRMONT ORWILL FAIRMONT MOUNT THEIR OWN EFFORT AND JOIN WITH BERKLEY, PARK, AND OTHERS?                                                               

Fairmount has joined the Alliance of Neighborhoods, which has been specifically formed to address the gas and oil issues south of downtown.

 

WHAT ARE FAIRMOUNT AND MISTLETOE DOING ABOUT THE WELL?

Based on information at the Neighborhood Alliance meetings, Fairmount has negotiated leases with Colt Exploration and or Fort Worth Energy, with approximately 70% of the homeowners signing leases.  However, they are participating in the Alliance, and will continue to support the Alliance’s efforts to get the best deal for all the other neighborhoods.  Mistletoe is part of the Neighborhood Alliance, and for the most part have not signed a lease with any company.)

 

WILL THE DRILLING AFFECT THE RESALE PROPERTY VALUE?  THERE IS A BELIEF THAT IT WILL CHANGE, AND SOME FEEL IT MAY NOT BE POSITIVE, WITH LIMITED INFORMATION ON HISTORIC DISTRICTS.  CAN WE GET AN INDEPENDENT RESEARCH TEAM TO ASSESS THIS SITUATION?

            TBD, SEE ACTION ITEMS

 

HOW WILL TAD DETERMINE THE VAUATION OF THE MINERALS?  WHEN WILL THEY ASSES THE INCREASED VALUATION, IF ANY?

The value of minerals (gas and old) will be determined after the completion of drilling through a complex formula established by Texas law. The full value will be determined approximately one year after the completion of the drilling.

 

WHAT IS THE CITY OF FORT WORTH DOING WITH THEIR PORTION OF THE REVENUES?

RPIA and the Neighborhood Alliance have collectively agreed to work together to develop a strategy to deal with the City of Fort Worth.  The overall consensus is to work with the City to ensure that a fair share of the City windfall is put back into the neighborhood infrastructure projects.

 

WHAT WILL THE SONIC VIBRATION FROM THE DRILLING RIG HAVE ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE NEARBY HOMES?

Per BlakeGeoServices: “I do not think the rig vibration will have any effect on foundations.  I have worked in the mining industry where we would set off explosive charges fairly close to residential areas.  Seismic monitoring and inspections showed no impact.  I would venture to say that vibrations would not exceed what is given off by traffic on 8th avenue.”

 

WILL THE DRILL LOCATION MEET WITH THE CITY ORDINANCE OR IS A VARIANCE NECESSARY FOR THE 600 FOOT CLEARANCE.  RULE 37?   

Per, Four Sevens, the proposed site along 8th Avenue, almost directly across from Braum’s, is considered to be in a “high impact area” requiring special considerations.  It does not meet the 6oo foot clearance, and will require one of three activities before the drilling can begin:

  1. A release from the homeowners, and businesses that fall within the area.
  2. A variance to the requirements by the zoning commission or appropriate city organization.
  3. A waiver from the ordinance by the City Council.

Colt/LPS would not be more specific as to what approach, Four Sevens was to take, but they clearly know that they have to pursue an exception process, once they have the requisite number of leases to make the project viable. LPS is convinced they will get enough RPIA homeowners to sign leases, which will be the go-ahead to petition the City Council for a waiver to the high impact drilling requirements.

 

It appears that FWE locations will not require waivers from the City of Fort Worth, since the drill sites near Ryan Place are in industrial areas, with adequate clearance from residential sites.

 

 

WILL THE DRILLING ACTIVITY AND PROXIMITY OF THE GAS WELL RQUIRE A CHANGE IN HOMEOWNERS INSURANCE?

Based on discussions with, USAA, Farmers Bureau, and State Farm, there should be no increase in homeowners insurance specifically due to the fact that the drilling company is required by law to have adequate liability insurance in the event of any type of incident at the drill site or the surrounding area/community. Only if your house was sitting on top of  an open pit mine, or a major gas storage tank, would the homeowners policy require changes.  Clearly some insurance companies have different underwriting rules, but the large, reputable companies at this point do not consider any additional requirements.

 

WHAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COMPANY IN THE EVENT OF A DISASTER?  IS THERE A PUBLIC EVACUATON PLAN FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD?                                                                      

By City Ordinance, Four Sevens is to have a specific evacuation plan before drilling. Colt will produce a specific plan for RPIA to publish on its web site.

 

WHAT ARE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES FROM THE DRILLING AND DISCOVERY OF GAS IN THE AREA?

The two most obvious tax consequences are:

  1. The royalty income received from the drilling company is taxable by the IRS under normal income rules.
  2. The property tax “could” increase based on calculations from TAD as they asses the fair share value of the gas reservoir.

 

We have asked the committee members to research the tax issues in more detail, and here is what Dave Frye and his group put together:

 

Property Tax

If you have an interest in a gas well, Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) will appraise the value of the well on January 1st of each year. This value is supposed to represent the fair market value of the well and equipment.  Just like your home’s appraised value, this value is supposed to represent the price a willing seller and a willing buyer would trade for the well.  TAD takes into account the price being received for the well’s natural gas and its estimated remaining life.  Your value will be determined by taking the total well value and reducing it by the size of your ownership in the production.  That is, if you are entitled to 1 percent of the revenue from the well, you will be assessed 1 percent of the well’s value.

 

Again, just like your home, the various taxing entities such as Tarrant County, the City of Fort Worth, and Fort Worth ISD will tax the appraised value.  These taxes should total a little less than 3 percent of the appraised value.

 

Severance Taxes

 

Revenue from the well will have severance taxes taken out before you get paid.  (The State needs to get its share).

 

Income Taxes

 

You will be responsible for paying Federal Income taxes on the revenue you receive.  The company that remits your revenue will not withhold any taxes.  (Uncle Sam needs his share, too).

 

 

 



__________________
-Chris Shipman
bobh621
Registered: 08/08/06
Posts: 1

    09/25/07 at 08:15 AM
Reply with quote#24

Both Four Sevens and Fort Worth Energy tell me that the maximum practical horizintal distance from the well site is 3,500 feet or a gas gathering distance of about 4,000 feet. The site mentioned for Fort Worth Energy are much further than that from my property. Will Fort Worth Energy offer me a lease even though they do not have any chance of reaching my property for gas production? If so what will they do to recoup their investment?It seems to me that they would try to sell the lease to another producing company, and if so, they only site within 4,000 feet of my property is the Eighth Ave site. The lease provision of prohibiting the Eighth Ave site will just kill any marketing opportunity for the lease on my property. I oppose this provision in the lease.


__________________
Bob Haubold
2019 Ward Parkway
mkdulle
Registered: 07/25/06
Posts: 3

    09/25/07 at 08:22 PM
Reply with quote#25

Bob, I asked some of our Berkeley Task Force members for help in responding to your concerns. Mark Smith, a BTF member and an oil-and-gas operator (although not in the Barnett Shale) sent me this response:

I posed this exact question to XTO and their response is below:

 

“To the best of my knowledge, there are several horizontals in excess of 5000' in the play already. XTO has drilled two under Eagle Mountain Lake. The wells experienced no drilling or completion problems. I consulted our drilling department, the technology exists to drill 6500'-7000' laterals. If the area is good it will certainly bear the increased cost to drill the extra long laterals, if that is what it takes to develop the area fully. In fact, Berkeley may be in the core, thickest part of Barnett, which is even better than first tier

 

Mark E. Smith

M. E. Operating and Services, Inc

 

I hope this allays your concerns. Your lot and those around you can definitely be reached by the longer laterals, so it is not imperative that a well be drilled on 8th Ave. to reach all our Berkeley neighbors.
rpm4565
Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 10

    10/03/07 at 03:33 PM
Reply with quote#26

My name is Randy Means and I have resided in the same house on Berkeley Place since 1984.  For the past 10 months I have served with several other Berkeley residents on the Berkeley Gas Drilling Task Force. 
Unfortunately the Berkeley Place bulletin board has apparently been infiltrated by persons from outside the neighborhood with a specific agenda to disrupt our independent gas lease investigations.  In addition to making false statements about the residents in Berkeley who worked on these lease questions, they have falsely represented themselves as residents of the neighborhood, both in our BPA meetings and on this bulletin board.
Case in point:  At the September 12th BPA meeting a man identified himself as "Mike Naughton, from Park Place".  He then made several statements challenging the merits of the lease proposal that had been presented, along with suggestions that the Berkeley Task Force was "in bed with" a particular company.  Following his public statements, this same person approached me privately at the meeting and made further accusations alleging misconduct on the part of the Berkeley Task Force.

We have since determined that "Mike Naughton" is actually  Michael Timothy Naughton, who does not live on Park Place and is NOT a resident of Berkeley at all. He is in reality a Landman, employed by Four Sevens Resources.  This is the same landman company that is currently promoting a gas lease that could allow for a gas well to be drilled on the rail yard between Stanley and 8th Avenue. 

He is also the same individual that tried to disrupt the investigative work of the Berkeley Task Force earlier this year with a letter accusing the TF of intimidating residents and implying that litigation could result.  Unfortunately for Mr. Naughton, this "scare tactic" had no effect and we continued our legitimate work on behalf of the neighborhood.  It appears that after his letter did not stop our work, and after his own employer apologized for it, he chose to subsequently interject himself into the BPA meeting in a further attempt to disrupt our progress and impede any proposal that competed with his own.  

As a legitimate Berkeley resident, I cannot imagine how anyone that is willing to make false statements in a public forum solely for the purpose of disrupting legitimate efforts to investigate a competing offer could possibly think anyone in Berkeley could trust anything he says or represents about his own or a competing business.  I suspect most Berkeley residents can recognize the risks of engaging in any business venture with someone who behaves in that manner.  This also probably raises concerns about any company that would support such behavior.

As the chairman of the Berkeley Gas Drilling Task Force I think I speak for our entire task force when I say that we are saddened and disappointed that this otherwise legitimate business matter has been soiled in this manner.  I apologize for our apparent inability to prevent this type of interference and look forward to our continuing opportunity to provide accurate information for the benefit of all Berkeley residents.

By the way, Mr. "Roxy3358", how is it that you know that the "Timmy" who posted a message and who was not otherwise identified, was actually the "Mike" that you refer to?  Could it be because "Roxy3358" is merely the latest version of "Timmy" and that "Timmy" was simply another pseudonym for Michael Timothy Naughton?  Is it getting tough remembering which name you're using in each forum?        
     



__________________
Randy Means
1941 Berkeley Place
resident since 1984
bpawebmstr
Moderator
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 5

    10/03/07 at 07:55 PM
Reply with quote#27

I am the Moderator of the Berkeley Place Bulletin Board.  I have temporarily banned roxy3385 (sims3385@yahoo.com) from the BB.  This includes removal of Posts from visibility.  The registrant provided no information at registration to allow verification as a resident of Berkeley.  I have emailed roxy3385 asking for that information.

Don Willis
2405 Warner Road

__________________
Berkeley Place Assoc Webmaster
rpm4565
Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 10

    10/04/07 at 03:01 PM
Reply with quote#28

This morning I was approached at the Old Neighborhood Grill by a man who identified himself as Michael Naughton.  I recognized him as the same individual who identified himself at the Sept. 12th  Berkeley Place meeting as "Mike Naughton, Park Place".

Mr. Naughton stated that he does in fact live on Park Place and has done so for approximately 8 months.  I advised that there were no property records that would confirm that and asked if he could provide any proof of this fact.  He replied that he did not have to prove anything.

A check of the online Tarrant Appraisal District records does not indicate any property on Park Place is owned by anyone by that name.  It should be noted that residents of the rental apartments on the north side of Park Place are not members of the Berkeley Place Association and, as renters, are not mineral owners in Berkeley.
 
No one by that name appears in the Berkeley Place Directory, which was published in August of this year.  The Berkeley Place newsletter, the Poobah, is distributed each month to each home in the neighborhood.  The May 2007 and June 2007 editions included notifications that the new neighborhood directory was being prepared.  The front page President's letter in the June 2007 edition urged all residents to verify their correct address in the draft directory that was available online, or to contact the BPA with any address information they wanted included.  The May 2007 edition carried a separate article about the new directory, with a large headline urging resident's input.  If Mr. Naughton arrived in the neighborhood approximately 8 months ago as he indicated, that would suggest he arrived sometime in either February or possibly March.

Again, note that apartment renters are not members of the association and have no mineral ownership interest unless they own other property in the neighborhood.

The treasurer for the Berkeley Place Association advised me that no one by that name is a member of the association.  At the present time I am unable to independently verify Mr. Naughton is a resident of Berkeley, outside of his personal claim.

If he is in fact a resident of the neighborhood - and a proper member of the association - then I was mistaken, stand corrected and apologize.  It would seem to be a simple matter for him to identify his actual residence and remove any questions, but he has chosen not to do so.

Today he appeared to be in possession of a copy of my earlier posting to this Bulletin Board, which included the disclosure of his employment with Four Sevens Energy Co., LLC.  Four Sevens is the land leasing company representing Chesapeake Energy Company.  Mr. Naughton gave no indication that any of that information is incorrect.
 


__________________
Randy Means
1941 Berkeley Place
resident since 1984
GeorgeBean
Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 8

    10/12/07 at 04:44 PM
Reply with quote#29

Do any of you understand the requirements for a subordination agreement with one's mortgage company?  Do I need an agreement to receive the bonus or just the royalties?  Any other issues relating to a subordination agreement that I need to be aware of?  My lender requires a $300 processing fee plus a survey of my land.  They 'may' require an appraisal as well.

Thanks,
George


cjones1
Registered: 10/06/07
Posts: 4

    10/13/07 at 02:34 PM
Reply with quote#30

It is my understanding that a subordination agreement protects the oil/gas company in case your house is foreclosed on.  If your home is foreclosed on and there is not an agreement then all operations will stop.  Then they would either have to purchase your house or cease operations. I thought we were not going to have to deal with the subordination agreement???  Four Sevens has taken that out of their lease.  They told me that only a handful of homes may be affected by the subordination agreement.  They explained that the only ones that would be affected would be the homes where the well bore travels directly underneath.  It was also explained that banks only used to charge $25 to $50.  Welcome to now....they charge excessive amounts because they can.  I guess they want a piece of the pie.  If you have a good relationship with your bank they may not charge you at all.  It may be that the heat needs to be turned up on the bankers.  I will not sign a lease if it contains a subordination agreement.  And yes, they can hold up royalties but I don't think it affects your bonus. However, if they require money plus a survey and an appraisal you can kiss your bonus bye bye.


__________________
I think on cjones I gave the wrong email add.
cjones1
Registered: 10/06/07
Posts: 4

    10/15/07 at 11:57 AM
Reply with quote#31

I received my lease on Saturday and have a few questions.  Since I cannot ask questions at CC Club, which I don't think is very businesslike, this  needs to be addressed before I decide to sign anything.  The letter states that I will be paid on the amount of acreage listed on the schedule 1, however there is no acerage or legal description listed on it.  How will I know if my acreage will be calculated correctly to the middle of the street?  Should I bring my Tarrant Appraisal papers with me?   If it's not on the schedule 1 how will they know what I will be paid? This is bringing out the skeptic in me.


__________________
I think on cjones I gave the wrong email add.
rpm4565
Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 10

    10/15/07 at 12:58 PM
Reply with quote#32

CJones1,
Below is a portion of an email message posted on the Berkeley Buzz from FWE concerning the Schedule 1, following the mailing of the lease package you received.  I think it answers you question. 
 
"We will be sending out a new packet with this explanation and their lease with a filled out Schedule I showing each lessor’s net mineral acres and the amount of money they will receive."  
 
If that does not address your question, I'd suggest you call or visit their office on Main St., as their letter suggests.  It is my understanding that their initial calculations have been taken directly from TAD records and are to include the middle of the street and your portion of any alleyway.  I've also understood that,  because TAD can make a mistake, FWE will look at any survey or other credible documentation that you may have that might be more accurate so you & company can  reach agreement on the accurate acreage calculation.  
  
 
 
  

__________________
Randy Means
1941 Berkeley Place
resident since 1984
cjones1
Registered: 10/06/07
Posts: 4

    10/22/07 at 03:41 PM
Reply with quote#33

OK I just got a FedEx package today from Chesapeake.  With the $12,500.00 bonus and them meeting all our criteria, as addresses in the Chesapeake letter, please tell me why this is not a better offer.  It looks as though, as a neighborhood, we are making out much better.  I need some compelling reasons not to sign with Chesapeake.   Can someone help me out with this?  Thanks.


__________________
I think on cjones I gave the wrong email add.
rpm4565
Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 10

    10/22/07 at 05:28 PM
Reply with quote#34

You indicate in your message that this latest offer from Chesapeake meets "all our criteria".  I'm not sure what criteria you are referring to.
The letter I received from Chesapeake clearly indicates that they control a drilling site on the 8th Avenue rail yard, presumably immediately north of the church property.  The east-west distance between the curb on 8th Avenue and the nearest home on Stanley is approximately 550 ft. (using Google Earth website satellite photos).  The city ordinance requires that any well must be at least 75 feet from any public street. (Sec. 15-42, Para. C., item 2., p. 43).
If centered precisely, this would place a well bore approximately 475 feet from homes on Stanley, with the surrounding rigs, tank batteries, and other rig paraphernalia that must extend out from the well bore that much closer.  This location of a well does not meet any "criteria" of the Berkeley Neighborhood Association, or the Berkeley Task Force that worked on this issue.  There is considerable opposition throughout the neighborhood to any well being closer than the 600 foot minimum to any Berkeley home, and that opposition is not limited to a few isolated residents on Stanley Avenue.  You may not share that view, as is your right, but it is not correct to suggest that a well in that location meets the criteria of the neighborhood. 

In addition, a well located on a that precise spot would be approximately 167 feet from the nearest residence on the opposite side of 8th avenue, so the bore would need to be moved further west to meet a city minimum of 200 feet from any residence, thus moving the well closer to Stanley homes.

If the well bore were moved further south on the rail yard property in an effort to gain maximum diagonal distance from the Stanley homes, it might be possible to move 600 feet from those homes, but this point would be approximately 255 feet from the nearest home on the opposite side of 8th Avenue and approximately 257 feet from the Braums entry door.
The compelling reasons you ask for a very simple:  Your choice of company in this instance amounts to a vote to support a particular well site.  Chesapeake intends to place a well on 8th, if they acquire the leases and the permit.  The XTO lease terms guarantee that those leases cannot be used by any operator to drill from 8th.  That is the choice you have.   
I would also draw your attention to how the competing companies calculate the bonus.  The XTO lease includes your half of the street and any alleyway.  The Chesapeake lease relies solely on your plat, which is a smaller area.  The Chesapeake lease also has the homeowner warrant and agree to defend title conveyed to the gas company, while the XTO lease places the title burden on them.  I suggest you seek your own counsel for the consideration of other detailed distinctions between the leases.

I hope this information helps with your question.  If I've missed your point, please advise.    


__________________
Randy Means
1941 Berkeley Place
resident since 1984
cjones1
Registered: 10/06/07
Posts: 4

    10/22/07 at 07:43 PM
Reply with quote#35

Just got off the phone with Johnnie Johnson, an Oil & Gas Attorney in Houston who is a friend of a friend.  He explained to me that you are correct with  respect to the FWE/XTO leases, or whomever leases to FWE/XTO.  They are pretty much guaranteed not to be able to be used by anyone but XTO.  Are you implying that it guarantees no one will drill on 8th?  I was told that Chesapeake will drill on 8th regardless. He explained that if I signed with XTO then I would be left out of royalties on the 8th Ave site.  He said that since the company partnering with XTO is in a major lawsuit with Chesapeake, royalties could be tied up for years, and those properties leased by FWE/XTO could ultimately be forfeited to Chesapeake anyway.

When I called one of the numbers for Chesapeake I asked why there was a discrepancy on my acreage.  They explained that those figures come from the Appraisal district, which by the way, conicides with my tax statement.  They will always adjust the acreage to include the alley and the street.  When they calculated mine it ended up more than the FWE/XTO lease.

I really have no opinion either way where a drill site is as long as I participate in the royalties.  I will do further checking before I sign a lease to make sure I have made the right decision.

Thanks for your input.

__________________
I think on cjones I gave the wrong email add.
rpm4565
Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 10

    10/22/07 at 09:34 PM
Reply with quote#36

If you will please read the Berkeley Task Force report that was distributed at the BPA meeting, published in the Poobah, and included in the recent packet from the BPA that was delivered to every Berkeley home, you will note that we specifically point out that no one can guarantee that no other company can acquire the ability to drill from the 8th Avenue site.  If you have interpreted anything I've said to be a guarantee against it never occurring, then I've mispoke or you've misunderstood.
There are only three ways that I know of to completely prevent a well from being drilled on any specific piece of land.  You can deny them the surface rights to the pad site, you can deny them the leases needed to assemble enough contiguous land to make a well both legal and economic, and you can deny them the city permit to drill.  For our purposes here, I've presumed that the driller can acquire the permit from the state, because they seem pretty good at meeting that hurdle.
Before any driller can consider a well to reach the minerals under a particular area they must first find a surface location where it is feasible to put a well (enough space, access, etc.) and they must acquire the rights to that land.  They can either purchase that land, or lease or purchase the right to operate a well on the surface.  Nothing happens until they see some potential opportunity to acquire that location.  That hurdle is obvious and not really significant to our discussion.

The second two hurdles are the most relevant for a neighborhood considering leases in their area.

In order to justify a well on a particular surface location, the company must assemble lease rights to enough contiguous land to support a feasible drilling pattern.  Feasible means that it satisfies the legal and technical spacing requirements of the Texas Railroad Commission and is economically viable.

If the particular pattern they propose would be too close to other wells or other lease holders, then they might face technical difficulties with their state drilling permit.  If the leased land is not sufficient to offer enough potential production to make the well appear economically viable, then the profit would be insufficient and the operator would make the business decision to avoid the well because there was no profit in it.  Therefore, if an operator cannot assemble enough leased land, either because the landowners choose not to lease or have leased with someone else, then he cannot pursue a well. 

Remember that most any contract can be sold, and this includes a gas lease.  If you lease mineral rights to one company, then that company could resell whatever rights they've acquired from you to another company.  This could even happen more than once.  That is how many lease transactions are conducted, with a "landman" handling the initial lease and then transferring it on some predetermined terms to another company who will actually operate the well under the terms of the lease.  Note that any company that acquires the lease is bound by the same terms and cannot change the terms unless there is some further agreement with the Lessor (landowner). 

The other hurdle for a well is the need for a drilling permit from the City of Fort Worth.  The city has a detailed ordinance you've likely heard about that regulates drilling and establishes a process for obtaining a permit.  For purposes of the Berkeley discussion, the rules regarding a "High Impact Permit" are the only relevant rules.  In that situation, which would apply to the 8th Avenue site, the only way a permit can be obtained is if the surrounding landowners ALL agreed (particular types of landowners are required: residences, church, hospital, park, school, and others) to waive any objection to a well, or if the City Council approves a waiver after a public hearing.  This means that any well on 8th Avenue will most likely require a public hearing before the City Council and be determined by a majority vote (5 out of 9).  This will be a political policy decision, with loud voices likely on both sides of the question.  Like any political decision, I suggest that it is not easy to predict.

The effect of the FWE/XTO lease that was reported to the neighborhood by the Berkeley Task Force is to insure that THAT company will not drill from the 8th Avenue site, nor will it drill from any location that does not guarantee certain distance protections.  It also means that if those leases are sold to any other company, the next company cannot use those leases to support a well that does not meet the same criteria.  This effectively removes any land leased under those terms from use by a company that wants to drill from 8th.  The more land leased under those terms, the less land available to the 8th Ave. operator, and the less extensive their activities from that site could be. 
But it would not guarantee that no other operator could acquire all he needs to make a well go on 8th.  If he can acquire enough leases to make it economic, and he can get the permit, then I would expect him to drill. 
Denying him the necessary leases, either by a refusal to lease or by leasing with another on terms that could not be bought, and denying the permit are the only relevant absolute prohibitions against the use of any location.  I'd hoped we'd made that clear in previous presentations, and I hope I've explained it to excess here.  If I've left any part of this unclear, please advise.

As for his legal opinion about royalties being tied up for years, I'm not sure about that and would not propose any contradictory legal opinion or speculation.  My initial reaction would be that the question of any monetary dispute between Chesapeake and FWE would be resolved with some sort of money damages award between those parties, as is the case with most civil lawsuits, and that that dispute does not reach into a separate contract between FWE and any lessor(homeowner). But I am not offering any legal opinion or advice on that question and direct you to rely on your own choice of counsel and advisor. 
Again, the question of who you choose to sign with, if anyone, boils down to the question of which drilling site you want to encourage. 
As for the question about acreage calculation and bonus payment, I can only go by the lease terms presented to us and that there has been no indication other than your phone conversation to suggest that Chesapeake was using any calculation other than the plat designation maintained by TAD.  Like everything else, it is your decision about whether you are satisfied with the acreage calculation. 
As for being left out of any royalties on the 8th site, that seems an unusual comment, or else I miss his point.  Obviously, if you sign with FWE/XTO then you would not participate in any royalties from Chesapeake and any other well site.  Likewise, if you sign with Chesapeake, then you would not participate in any royalties from FWE/XTO.  You only receive royalties for minerals that you lease (gas or oil or whatever) and you can only lease a given set of minerals with one entity.  So, again, I'm not sure I see any significance to that point.

(Note that any lease of small plots like our home sites are typically "pooled" with other acreage into a larger "drilling unit" and every member of that unit shares in the proceeds of any well that is a part of the "pool".  So, if your lease is part of a pool that includes multiple wells from a particular pad site, you would participate in royalties from every well that was part of that same "pool".)   





__________________
Randy Means
1941 Berkeley Place
resident since 1984
Shipman
Super Moderators
Registered: 07/13/06
Posts: 18

    10/24/07 at 12:35 PM
Reply with quote#37



CJONES1 and RPM - Could you please do everyone a favor and identify yourselves in your postings?  Please remember the recent issues we've had with non-Berkeley residents being hostile and abusive on this forum.  It's important that we know who we're communicating with.   

You can add a signature to your profile so that it's automatically posted on all of your messages.  My name, for example, is automatically put at the bottom of all my messages.  I see that "cjones" has some information in his/her signature file, but it's not a name, it's a comment about an email address. 

I know from frequenty emailing that RPM is Randy Means.  I couldn't say with 100% certainty who "cjones" is although I know several very nice people named Jones in the neighborhood!

Thanks!


__________________
-Chris Shipman
rpm4565
Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 10

    10/24/07 at 12:50 PM
Reply with quote#38

Point well taken Chris.  I've added a signature reference to my profile, so hopefully it will appear at the end of this message and anything subsequent.  In case that change doesn't take immediate effect, this is Randy Means, 1941 Berkeley Place.
Thanks.

__________________
Randy Means
1941 Berkeley Place
resident since 1984
Berkeley1925
Registered: 01/05/07
Posts: 1

    11/02/07 at 10:14 AM
Reply with quote#39

Before I forget to do this, I simply want to thank our neighborhood association's committee that investigated the pros & cons of gas drilling under Berkeley, along with their due diligence findings, negotiations and recommendations in their dealings with the gas companies interested in the mineral leases for our neighborhood.

Whether you agree or disagree with their findings and recommendations, or whether you signed a lease or not, we were all well represented by our good neighbors who had the exact same concerns and questions that we all had.

So, to Berkeley Association president Mary Dulle, Randy Means and all of the others who worked so hard on this, thanks!

Scott Turner
1925 Berkeley Place


__________________
Scott Turner
Previous Thread | Next Thread
Reply

 
Bookmarks
 
Digg Diggdel.icio.us del.icio.usStumbleUpon StumbleUponGoogle Google